SIMULATING
EXTREME ANISOTROPY
WITHOUT MESH
ALIGNMENT
Carl Sovinec
Univ. of
Wisconsin-Madison
Tom Gianakon
Los Alamos
National Laboratory
MHD Working
Group, Oct. 28 2001
APS 2001, Long
Beach CA
·
Nonlinear
simulations of high-temperature plasmas must be able to resolve thermal
transport anisotropy associated with the magnetic field direction.
·
The
saturation of pressure-driven modes is sensitive to changes in magnetic
topology due to parallel thermal conduction.
·
The
ratio of parallel to perpendicular thermal conductivities leads to one
threshold mechanism for neoclassical tearing modes.
·
When
the magnetic field is aligned with the grid or when the angle between and the grid is
uniform, the anisotropy is accurately represented by standard techniques.
·
A
nonlinearly evolving magnetic topology requires more sophisticated approaches:
·
There
is curvature in the magnetic field.
·
The
topology of islands and stochastic regions is three-dimensional.
·
Even
3D automated mesh refinement schemes would be severely challenged by these
conditions; 3D refinement is possible but 3D alignment near a separatrix is
not.
·
The
NIMROD code has addressed this
challenge by using high-order finite-element basis functions, which represent
curvature with or without alignment.
·
The
increase in spatial convergence rates with basis function order has been
verified.
·
Spatial
convergence rates are retained with nonuniform meshing.
A quantitative measure of the numerical error can be determined by a simple
test problem.
·
The
simplest thermal conduction problem is a 2D box with Dirichlet boundary
conditions and a source. If the source
drives the lowest eigenfunction only,
in the domain
,
it produces the temperature distribution
.
·
A
numerical test with B everywhere tangent to this temperature distribution and a
uniform rectilinear grid has severely misaligned
with the grid. With
and
, the inverse of the resulting T(0,0) is a good measure of the effective
of the numerical
algorithm.
·
The
magnetic field is created by inducing a perpendicular current density
distribution that is proportional to the heat source.
Anisotropic
Diffusion Demonstration
·
Start
from S=104, Pm=0.1 saturation of Test
Problem 1b (DIII-D-like equilibrium) that had kiso=0.423 m2/s=0.1n.
·
Freeze
magnetic evolution and just run anisotropic thermal diffusion over the
perpendicular time-scale (100 x resistive time-scale).
·
k┴=0.423, k||=4.23x108, Dt=1x10-4 s.
·
Island
appears in pressure contours immediately.
Pressure contours (color)
after 1.5 ms of anisotropic diffusion overlaid with Poincare surface of
section.
a)
b)
a) "Probe" located at (R=1.312, Z=-0.248)
and b) internal energy vs. time.
Time-scale in a) is ms, and in b) it's 10 ms.
· Steady-state transport is regained
after a perpendicular diffusion time.
a)
b)
a) "Probe" and b) internal energy. Time-scale is seconds.
· The n=0 pressure profile inside the island drops over the long
time-scale, reflecting the loss of insulation over the magnetic island.